Do not follow this hidden link or you will be blocked from this website !

Do Developed Economies Still Need to Create Pension Funds?

Philippe Trainar * Professeur titulaire de chaire assurance, CNAM (Centre national des arts et métiers) ; directeur, Fondation SCOR pour la Science ; membre, Conseil scientifique, ACPR (Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution). Contact : PTRAINAR-EXTERNAL@scor.com. L'auteur remercie particulièrement Vivien Levy-Garboua et Patrick Thourot pour leur lecture attentive de la première version de l'article et pour leurs remarques critiques et leurs suggestions qui ont permis de bonifier ce travail dont l'auteur reste cependant seul responsable des imperfections et des erreurs.


The French discussion on pension funds has been confined to their capacity to reduce the consequences of demographic decline, overshadowing their other economic advantages over the defined benefit system. After having presented pension funds and their great diversity regarding benefits, joining, and exiting, the article explains their role in France and in the other advanced economies, as well as the underlying socio-economic stakes. It then expounds and critically analyzes the main arguments that have long been used in France to oppose their development. However, there seems to have been a shift with the creation, by the recent Sapin law, of the legal and prudential vehicle that is necessary for their development. It remains to give this vehicle a fiscal and social status that would allow it to play a genuinely complementary role to the defined benefit system, while helping to finance French businesses.


Download PDF Format


Share email Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+